<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Video Game Media Watch - The Video Game Journalism Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vgmwatch.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vgmwatch.com</link>
	<description>The Video Game Journalism Review Blog.  Formerly the Video Game Ombudsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Journalistic Bias, &#8220;Paying&#8221; for Reviews, and Prostitution by David Gornoski</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1193#comment-169172</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gornoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1193#comment-169172</guid>
		<description>Very interesting blog entries there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting blog entries there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doug Perry&#8217;s Response to Taint Report by ian christy</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1112#comment-169132</link>
		<dc:creator>ian christy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1112#comment-169132</guid>
		<description>Ditto what Mike Blackney has written, and well noted. I finished the letter from Doug feeling a touch bullied and shamed rather than addressed as an objective audience trusted to weigh out statements to discern the subjective from the substantiative. 

I do hope Tom will clear the air, especially after awarding the non-exclusive with a 9, objectively or otherwise. Did the game deserve the 9 per his professional opinion? had he played any of the game yet when the conversation with Doug happened? 

e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto what Mike Blackney has written, and well noted. I finished the letter from Doug feeling a touch bullied and shamed rather than addressed as an objective audience trusted to weigh out statements to discern the subjective from the substantiative. </p>
<p>I do hope Tom will clear the air, especially after awarding the non-exclusive with a 9, objectively or otherwise. Did the game deserve the 9 per his professional opinion? had he played any of the game yet when the conversation with Doug happened? </p>
<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daily Mail Calls Out Madworld by fustacluck</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1183#comment-169069</link>
		<dc:creator>fustacluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1183#comment-169069</guid>
		<description>The article should be taken with a pinch of salt. The Daily Mail is known as censorship-supporting (of all arts) right-wing rag (the headline &quot;Ban This Sick Filth&quot; has been smeared across their pages on many more than one occasion), and is backed up by their main source being Mediawatch UK (formerly the National Viewers and Listeners Association).

Mediawatch UK is really just one man, John Beyer, and a secretary. Having met them both, they really are very nice people in person. They just believe that noone should be able to watch or interact with anything that might offend them, whether they&#039;ve seen the media in question or not. Unfortunately Mr. Beyer, being a protege of Mary Whitehouse (for non-British readers, she was a self-appointed media watchdog in the seventies whose greatest achievement was the harrassment of town councils into banning The Life of Brian from their cinemas), lives with the same self-importance as Mrs. Whitehouse, feeling that he&#039;s the last protector of decency, and so grasps at any opportunity for an interview.

This article will not actually change anyone&#039;s mind as the audience for the Daily Mail and Mr. Beyer, would already made their minds up either on games in general, or to just follow either of the sources blindly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article should be taken with a pinch of salt. The Daily Mail is known as censorship-supporting (of all arts) right-wing rag (the headline &#8220;Ban This Sick Filth&#8221; has been smeared across their pages on many more than one occasion), and is backed up by their main source being Mediawatch UK (formerly the National Viewers and Listeners Association).</p>
<p>Mediawatch UK is really just one man, John Beyer, and a secretary. Having met them both, they really are very nice people in person. They just believe that noone should be able to watch or interact with anything that might offend them, whether they&#8217;ve seen the media in question or not. Unfortunately Mr. Beyer, being a protege of Mary Whitehouse (for non-British readers, she was a self-appointed media watchdog in the seventies whose greatest achievement was the harrassment of town councils into banning The Life of Brian from their cinemas), lives with the same self-importance as Mrs. Whitehouse, feeling that he&#8217;s the last protector of decency, and so grasps at any opportunity for an interview.</p>
<p>This article will not actually change anyone&#8217;s mind as the audience for the Daily Mail and Mr. Beyer, would already made their minds up either on games in general, or to just follow either of the sources blindly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How PC Are Games? by Billy Kirk</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1189#comment-168443</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1189#comment-168443</guid>
		<description>Brinstar, I&#039;m afraid you are misunderstanding, and perhaps that is my fault due to the diction. While it is true that some use political correctness in a pejorative fashion, there are also writers who do not use it in that manner, and I am not using it in that manner in this piece. I don&#039;t see anywhere in my writing above where you can assume for fact that I am chastising John or using the term &quot;PC&quot; in a disdainful manner.

For the record, I believe John has a valid case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brinstar, I&#8217;m afraid you are misunderstanding, and perhaps that is my fault due to the diction. While it is true that some use political correctness in a pejorative fashion, there are also writers who do not use it in that manner, and I am not using it in that manner in this piece. I don&#8217;t see anywhere in my writing above where you can assume for fact that I am chastising John or using the term &#8220;PC&#8221; in a disdainful manner.</p>
<p>For the record, I believe John has a valid case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How PC Are Games? by Billy Kirk</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1189#comment-168439</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1189#comment-168439</guid>
		<description>tekanji, good point concerning the controversy over RE5 - it slipped my mind  when writing this article.

As far as women not being an ethnic group, I of course understand that and did not make that mistake. However, granted, I could have structured the sentence better. I identify that she is Chinese and that she worries over the lack of representation of women as well as other ethnic groups.... I should have flipped the phrasing, as I meant &quot;other ethnic groups&quot; to be connected to Chinese, and the female issue to stand separate. I could have said &quot;for other ethnic groups, as well as females&quot;. That could have been written a little cleaner, but I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t give me the benefit of the doubt there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tekanji, good point concerning the controversy over RE5 &#8211; it slipped my mind  when writing this article.</p>
<p>As far as women not being an ethnic group, I of course understand that and did not make that mistake. However, granted, I could have structured the sentence better. I identify that she is Chinese and that she worries over the lack of representation of women as well as other ethnic groups&#8230;. I should have flipped the phrasing, as I meant &#8220;other ethnic groups&#8221; to be connected to Chinese, and the female issue to stand separate. I could have said &#8220;for other ethnic groups, as well as females&#8221;. That could have been written a little cleaner, but I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t give me the benefit of the doubt there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How PC Are Games? by tekanji</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1189#comment-168369</link>
		<dc:creator>tekanji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1189#comment-168369</guid>
		<description>As one journalist to another, I would just like to say that the language you&#039;ve used in this post is sometimes incorrect and/or biased, which hurts your credibility. In particular, women aren&#039;t an &quot;ethnic&quot; group. If you&#039;re talking about the underrepresentation of groups outside of the &quot;default&quot; (white, male, straight, cissexual, etc), then you&#039;re going to want to use terms like &quot;minority&quot; or &quot;non-privileged&quot;. I would also suggest that, instead of &quot;political correctness in games&quot; (which is a highly loaded term), it would be better to choose a more neutral term, such as &quot;social consciousness&quot;. It would also be helpful to familiarize yourself with the terminology for this particular subject, which is &quot;inclusive game design&quot;. 

As per your question, Tracy John&#039;s observations are definitely &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; an &quot;outside case&quot;. The most obvious example would be the recent controversy over &lt;i&gt;Resident Evil 5&lt;/i&gt; has generated, some of which was also chronicled at MTV Multiplayer. It&#039;s not hard to find gaming sites/blogs that talk about how gaming intersects with other issues such as politics and anti-oppression activism and it would definitely be to the benefit of this site for you to do some research into the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one journalist to another, I would just like to say that the language you&#8217;ve used in this post is sometimes incorrect and/or biased, which hurts your credibility. In particular, women aren&#8217;t an &#8220;ethnic&#8221; group. If you&#8217;re talking about the underrepresentation of groups outside of the &#8220;default&#8221; (white, male, straight, cissexual, etc), then you&#8217;re going to want to use terms like &#8220;minority&#8221; or &#8220;non-privileged&#8221;. I would also suggest that, instead of &#8220;political correctness in games&#8221; (which is a highly loaded term), it would be better to choose a more neutral term, such as &#8220;social consciousness&#8221;. It would also be helpful to familiarize yourself with the terminology for this particular subject, which is &#8220;inclusive game design&#8221;. </p>
<p>As per your question, Tracy John&#8217;s observations are definitely <i>not</i> an &#8220;outside case&#8221;. The most obvious example would be the recent controversy over <i>Resident Evil 5</i> has generated, some of which was also chronicled at MTV Multiplayer. It&#8217;s not hard to find gaming sites/blogs that talk about how gaming intersects with other issues such as politics and anti-oppression activism and it would definitely be to the benefit of this site for you to do some research into the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How PC Are Games? by Brinstar</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1189#comment-168324</link>
		<dc:creator>Brinstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1189#comment-168324</guid>
		<description>I think you are framing this incorrectly. This isn&#039;t an issue of &quot;political correctness&quot; this issue is about inclusiveness, diversity, and representation. By calling it &quot;political correctness&quot; you are implying that more diversity and more choice for gamers is a bad thing, that in giving gamers more choice and control over how they want their avatars to appear, companies are somehow pandering to complaints that are not legitimate or reasonable. It&#039;s perfectly reasonable for people to want their in-game avatars to have similar skin tones as they themselves have. The white male dominated gaming industry has seen to it that we have plenty of representation for white and pale skin tones, no one has implied that this is &quot;politically correct&quot;. What is unreasonable is your implication that non-white gamers who want skin tones that are representative of their skin colour is somehow an invalid complaint, and just a silly, arbitrary demand for &quot;political correctness&quot;.

Also? When were women (oh sorry -- &quot;females&quot;) considered an ethnic group? Are males an ethnic group as well?

You seem to believe that gamers arguing against the lack of diversity in games is a new or singluarly rare event. It&#039;s not. Socially and culturally conscious gamers have been discussing this in forums and communities and blogging about issues of diversity and representation and continue to do so.

Even the major gaming blogs have been discussing diversity issues as well, though not regularly or frequently. Newsweek, MTV Multiplayer, and even Kotaku and Joystiq have posted articles about race in games, gender in games, and other diversity and inclusiveness issues. Or maybe you&#039;ve forgotten all of those posts in your bid to frame this as &quot;political correctness&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are framing this incorrectly. This isn&#8217;t an issue of &#8220;political correctness&#8221; this issue is about inclusiveness, diversity, and representation. By calling it &#8220;political correctness&#8221; you are implying that more diversity and more choice for gamers is a bad thing, that in giving gamers more choice and control over how they want their avatars to appear, companies are somehow pandering to complaints that are not legitimate or reasonable. It&#8217;s perfectly reasonable for people to want their in-game avatars to have similar skin tones as they themselves have. The white male dominated gaming industry has seen to it that we have plenty of representation for white and pale skin tones, no one has implied that this is &#8220;politically correct&#8221;. What is unreasonable is your implication that non-white gamers who want skin tones that are representative of their skin colour is somehow an invalid complaint, and just a silly, arbitrary demand for &#8220;political correctness&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also? When were women (oh sorry &#8212; &#8220;females&#8221;) considered an ethnic group? Are males an ethnic group as well?</p>
<p>You seem to believe that gamers arguing against the lack of diversity in games is a new or singluarly rare event. It&#8217;s not. Socially and culturally conscious gamers have been discussing this in forums and communities and blogging about issues of diversity and representation and continue to do so.</p>
<p>Even the major gaming blogs have been discussing diversity issues as well, though not regularly or frequently. Newsweek, MTV Multiplayer, and even Kotaku and Joystiq have posted articles about race in games, gender in games, and other diversity and inclusiveness issues. Or maybe you&#8217;ve forgotten all of those posts in your bid to frame this as &#8220;political correctness&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Mess with (Empowered) Texans by David</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1178#comment-158018</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1178#comment-158018</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s regulating content or welfare-izing developers, government has no business tampering with our industry. God knows they&#039;ve screwed up virtually every other industry they touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s regulating content or welfare-izing developers, government has no business tampering with our industry. God knows they&#8217;ve screwed up virtually every other industry they touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTA IV = Scarface, The Godfather? WSJ Says &#8216;No&#8217;. by Benjamin Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1176#comment-153156</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1176#comment-153156</guid>
		<description>While I think that GTA IV was certainly an impressive accomplishment that serves to advance the &quot;art&quot; of video game creation, it fares very poorly when compared to works such as The Godfather and Ragtime.  Regardless of the apples to oranges problems with such a comparison, I can at least say that I didnâ€™t have any trouble watching The Godfather to completion.  GTA IV, on the other handâ€¦simply lost my interest.  

Thanks for this post.  It provided me with the motivation to finally write one of my own that I&#039;ve been meaning to get to for some time.  It pertains to the issue that I mentioned above, of games with good stories that just get too tedious for me to finish.  Feel free to check it out: http://www.benjaminhoyt.com/blog/2008/07/02/its-time-for-movie-mode/. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think that GTA IV was certainly an impressive accomplishment that serves to advance the &#8220;art&#8221; of video game creation, it fares very poorly when compared to works such as The Godfather and Ragtime.  Regardless of the apples to oranges problems with such a comparison, I can at least say that I didnâ€™t have any trouble watching The Godfather to completion.  GTA IV, on the other handâ€¦simply lost my interest.  </p>
<p>Thanks for this post.  It provided me with the motivation to finally write one of my own that I&#8217;ve been meaning to get to for some time.  It pertains to the issue that I mentioned above, of games with good stories that just get too tedious for me to finish.  Feel free to check it out: <a href="http://www.benjaminhoyt.com/blog/2008/07/02/its-time-for-movie-mode/" rel="nofollow">http://www.benjaminhoyt.com/blog/2008/07/02/its-time-for-movie-mode/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTA IV = Scarface, The Godfather? WSJ Says &#8216;No&#8217;. by beemoh</title>
		<link>http://vgmwatch.com/archives/1176#comment-152923</link>
		<dc:creator>beemoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgmwatch.com/?p=1176#comment-152923</guid>
		<description>I think the question here is not if GTAIV is as good as Scarface et al, but if GTAIV is as important to games as Scarface et al were to films. I think a lot of people on both sides of the divide may have got the two confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question here is not if GTAIV is as good as Scarface et al, but if GTAIV is as important to games as Scarface et al were to films. I think a lot of people on both sides of the divide may have got the two confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
